If you’re new here, welcome to #MajorRelate, a growing community of 8,900+ readers navigating the forces reshaping our world, work, wealth, and the way we live, offering sharp insights and fresh perspectives you won’t find anywhere else.
£100k isn’t a big salary; here’s why
Nine out of ten Britons earning over £100,000 do not consider themselves wealthy. Maybe you are one of them, maybe you definitely aren’t (and find this statistic laughable). But before you judge, meet Henry.
Back in 2019, Henry was a 28-year-old consultant earning just over £50,000. He was full of optimism about his future. He’d been in the workforce for eight years, and things seemed to be on the right track. He worked long hours, some weekends, but was secure that his career was gaining momentum. Fast-forward to 2025, and Henry, at 34, is now earning £103,500. His boss says he’s thriving. In wage terms, he’s made it to the six-figure mark.
So why does Henry feel like he’s been treading water these past six years?
Why does homeownership (even outside London) feel completely out of reach?
Why is it impossible to save for anything, a deposit, a house or even holidays?
He may have a ‘big’ job, but he has not done the ‘big expensive things’ in life yet. He’s in a relationship, but they don’t live together, and don’t have kids. And yet, he’s barely keeping up; he can barely afford to attend all his friends’ weddings.
He’s on a six-figure salary; he’s hitting midlife, and life still feels precarious. That’s because on paper, Henry’s made it. But in reality, Henry doesn’t feel secure for a very simple reason.
He may have had a £50k pay increase since 2019, but this has resulted in only a £6k increase in real disposable income (after accounting for inflation) - not monthly, YEARLY.
While his gross salary more than doubled, in real terms, his disposable income only increased by about 27% due to inflation and the rising cost of essentials. (THIS 27% REAL-TERMS INCREASE COMPARES TO A 106% NOMINAL INCREASE IN GROSS SALARY.)
This is the financial story (well model) of Henry; a man who should feel rich but doesn’t. And how in today’s economy, six figures doesn’t stretch as far as it should.
2019
Back in 2019, Henry lived in London and paid £850 a month for a shared rental in Zone 2. It was relatively central, and he saved money on commuting by cycling to work. He was also living in his mate’s parents’ buy-to-let, so the rent was reasonable. It was a fixed contract, and bills were included.
Henry lived a frugal life for a twenty-something in London, cooking 4-5 days at home. He was an Aldi man - spending £183 a month on groceries and only roughly £200 a month on eating out/beer money; which, given a pint then cost around £5, he didn’t feel too guilty. Monthly, Henry paid about £1,047 in tax and had a disposable income of around £1500. He saved a bit, mostly for travelling.
Henry got a promotion in 2019 and decided to move out of his friend’s flat share. He was done having his mate as his landlord and effectively paying rent that would eventually be his mate’s house deposit or inheritance.
Covid lockdown then proved a decider. Henry had had enough working from his tiny room in a noisy flat share, he was also mindful that his life needed to feel less like living in a student dorm and more like the 30-something man he was. The new place cost £1,650/month; a stretch, but it felt like time.
2025
Now, that same flat costs Henry £2,230/month. His landlord passed on the mortgage rate hikes. Henry knows that a one-bedroom flat is a luxury, but it doesn’t feel like it. There’s mould, the landlord has barely touched the place in years, and while Henry would like to eventually move his girlfriend in, they’ve only been dating for six months. He is also aware of the chaos and cost of the London rental market right now.
Henry still shops at Aldi, but that same bill now costs him £317 per month - a 73% increase. He still likes to go out, but that Friday pub bill has increased by £100. The average cost of a pint in London is nearly £7, much more near Henry’s office. Overall, his food bill has gone from £391 per month to £625 - a 60% increase - just to eat and drink exactly as he used to.
Between rent and food, costs have shifted from £1,241 a month to £2,855 a month.
Then there’s tax. Henry now pays £2,868/month — nearly three times what he paid when his salary was £50k. In total, £34,420.60 of his annual salary goes on tax.
So, in terms of disposable income, between 2019-2025, despite the £50k increase, Henry only sees an increase of £6k of real disposable annual income (adjusted for inflation).
What ifs?
Would things look different if Henry had kids? Maybe worse; he and his partner wouldn’t qualify for free childcare hours. We also didn’t factor in student loan payments or private pensions. Let’s assume Henry has no student debt thanks to parental help, but still can’t afford to contribute to a private pension beyond his workplace plan.
You could ask why Henry moved to his own flat. Maybe because he was under the illusion that he earned more money than he thought, and was at a professional stage in life when he could make those kinds of decisions. You could ask why he didn’t leave London. Because as a young professional, that is a bold move that, if you work for one of the big consultancy firms, would be challenging with recent return to office mandates. He could technically buy in a city like Leeds, where the average house price is £220,000 with a 10% deposit (£22k) and a mortgage of around £1,157p.m, but would he still be earning that salary in Leeds? You could ask, why didn’t he spread the costs with his girlfriend? Possibly, but they’ve only been dating for six months. The only way that many young professionals are managing these costs is by coupling up (DINKS), moving back home, or leaving the country.
Henrys
Henry belongs to a growing class: the High Earners Not Rich Yet - HENRYs. Coined by financial advisers, the term describes millennials in top tax brackets (from £65k up), disproportionately in London, often highly educated, yet struggling to feel economically secure.
According to The Economist, they account for 5% of taxpayers but nearly half of all income tax receipts. They represent a conversation we don’t want to have in Britain.
The problem with Henrys is that most people assume they are rich, but they aren’t - certainly in terms of their expectations at least. They are the people for whom the public rarely has sympathy - highly paid professionals in banking, consultancy, disproportionately in London and often access to the Bank of Mum and Dad. They are often least likely to talk about any of this publicly.
When he was Chancellor, Jeremy Hunt got into trouble when he claimed that £100k was “not a huge salary” for people in his constituency in Surrey. Many were outraged. But he wasn’t wrong - and now even high paid NHS consultants are in dispute, arguing their real pay has fallen by 26% since 2008. Relatively speaking, they are right. Look to America, where they see our professional salaries as laughable, and Silicon Valley tech companies see jobs in the UK as ‘cheap offshoring’.
This speaks to the broader economic point here that we are a poor country, pretending to be a rich country. The truth is that years of stagnant growth, depressed wages, a dysfunctional housing market, and low investment mean we are living in an era when the emerging middle class have struggled, the established middle have stagnated, and the working class have spiralled. Henrys are just one victim of that story; not the only victim, but one nonetheless.
And the point is, we need Henrys for our public services to function. Just as we need nurses, care workers and teachers. Around 60 per cent of all income tax revenue comes from the top 10pc of earners. This share has increased from 53.5 per cent in 2010 –11 to approximately 60.2 per cent in 2024 –25, a rise of about 6.7 percentage points, according to HMRC and the Office for Budget Responsibility.
Those with the broadest shoulders should carry the greatest burden, but under current constraints, many Henrys are opting out: moving abroad, rejecting pay rises, dropping down to four days a week to avoid tax and qualify for childcare hours. And the country can’t afford that brain drain or them stepping off the gas. We need to talk seriously about wages — not just at the bottom, but in the middle. And yes, at the top (and very top).
So no, £100k isn’t a small salary. But in today’s Britain, it doesn’t buy what it used to.
This isn’t about class war. It’s not about saying £100k is poverty. It’s about recognising that the rewards for work, including well-paid work, are shrinking in real terms after accounting for inflation.
The one thing that saves many Henrys? The Bank of Mum and Dad. Or a partner. Otherwise, six figures is not enough to stand still. We need a new conversation, not just about inequality but the shape of middle-class life. Because the old model under new economic conditions is creaking.
And Henry? He’s the canary in the coal mine.
Thanks for reading,
Eliza
The big issue with this is geography. Out of London, Henry is on a cracking salary, and would easily be able to make progress. He should move to the North East, buy a three bed Tyneside flat in a decent area for 200 grand and learn to surf. Obviously his company need to up sticks, too, though.
Great insights in this article. I left London almost 30 years ago as a young corporate worker and managed to land in the US. I see the problems you raise in the UK and the US. ‘Middle class’ used to imply some level of steady comfort, and while it is a very broad socioeconomic strata I have experienced a real sense of middle class squeeze over the years.
The housing situation in major cities can be crippling and combine that with missing out on the long term compounding effects of saving and before you know it you’re in your 40’s and time has burned away!
There are certainly disparities between the UK and US but the squeeze is real and I do think it’s hard to see a near term path to solving it for the next generation of city workers.